PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIT.TO vs. AVRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and Avantis Real Estate ETF (AVRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIT.TO is traded in CAD, while AVRE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVRE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIT.TO achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than AVRE's 8.60% return.


RIT.TO

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
7.57%
6M
9.98%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
6.65%

AVRE

1D
0.11%
1M
0.72%
YTD
8.60%
6M
6.51%
1Y
11.00%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RIT.TO
CI Canadian REIT ETF
7.57%11.98%2.51%5.37%-20.74%8.67%
AVRE
Avantis Real Estate ETF
8.60%3.37%9.18%6.70%-18.26%12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RIT.TO and AVRE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.64

The correlation between RIT.TO and AVRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RIT.TO
AVRE

Real Estate

96.0%
99.3%

Healthcare

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Real Estate

RIT.TO
96.0%
AVRE
99.3%

Healthcare

RIT.TO
4.0%
AVRE

-

Basic Materials

RIT.TO

-

AVRE

-

Communication Services

RIT.TO

-

AVRE

-

Consumer Cyclical

RIT.TO

-

AVRE

-

Consumer Defensive

RIT.TO

-

AVRE

-

Energy

RIT.TO

-

AVRE

-

Financial Services

RIT.TO

-

AVRE
0.1%

Industrials

RIT.TO

-

AVRE

-

Technology

RIT.TO

-

AVRE

-

Utilities

RIT.TO

-

AVRE
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIT.TO vs. AVRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIT.TO
RIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AVRE
AVRE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AVRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AVRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and Avantis Real Estate ETF (AVRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIT.TOAVREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.43

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

4.31

-0.06

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the AVRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIT.TO and AVRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIT.TOAVREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.95

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.29

+0.23

Drawdowns

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.72%, which is greater than AVRE's maximum drawdown of -26.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIT.TO and AVRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIT.TOAVREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.72%

-26.75%

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-7.71%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

-13.22%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-2.24%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-10.19%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.56%

-0.06%

Volatility

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) is 2.92%, while Avantis Real Estate ETF (AVRE) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that RIT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIT.TOAVREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.46%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

8.94%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

11.59%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

14.34%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

14.34%

+1.12%

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIT.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than AVRE's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIT.TO vs. AVRE - Dividend Comparison

RIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than AVRE's 3.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVRE
Avantis Real Estate ETF
3.51%4.30%3.99%3.33%3.78%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIT.TO
CI Canadian REIT ETF
4.59%4.85%5.17%5.04%5.04%3.82%4.92%4.35%5.11%5.05%5.28%4.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIT.TO and AVRE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVRE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVRE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for RIT.TO.

They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for RIT.TO and 0.17% for AVRE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIT.TO and AVRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer