PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RISR vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RISR vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RISR vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RISR achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's -0.92% return.


RISR

1D
0.00%
1M
2.31%
YTD
1.82%
6M
4.10%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
10Y*

PYLD

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RISR vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISR has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RISR vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RISR
RISR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RISR vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RISRPYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

1.72

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

2.39

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.84

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.31

7.60

-3.29

RISR vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RISR Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RISR and PYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RISRPYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

1.72

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.99

-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between RISR and PYLD is -0.43. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

RISR vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than PYLD's 6.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.93%5.95%5.67%7.96%4.26%0.30%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.36%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RISR vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISR drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISR and PYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RISRPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-4.52%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-3.25%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-2.28%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-0.64%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.79%

+0.43%

Volatility

RISR vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.61%. This indicates that RISR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RISRPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

1.61%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.04%

2.12%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.46%

3.43%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.04%

4.00%

+8.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.04%

4.00%

+8.04%