RISR vs. IRVH
RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond, while IRVH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RISR returned 10.84%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for IRVH. Their -0.27 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RISR charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IRVH.
Performance
RISR vs. IRVH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RISR achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly higher than IRVH's -4.59% return.
RISR
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.52%
IRVH
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -4.59%
- 1Y
- -3.57%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $471.52 | $4.02K | $5.19K | |
| $3.11M | $2.99M | $3.46M |
RISR vs. IRVH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 4.91% | 4.63% | 24.20% | 7.02% | 1.24% |
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -4.59% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 0.83% | -6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISR and IRVH is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2022 | -0.27 |
The correlation between RISR and IRVH shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISR vs. IRVH — Risk / Return Rank
RISR
IRVH
RISR vs. IRVH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RISR | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.90 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | -0.49 | +2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | -0.97 | +6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RISR vs. IRVH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISR drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, roughly equal to the maximum IRVH drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISR and IRVH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISR | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -14.98% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -6.48% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.07% | -8.03% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.49% | +11.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -9.76% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 3.26% | -2.17% |
Volatility
RISR vs. IRVH - Volatility Comparison
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) at 0.88%. This indicates that RISR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISR | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 0.88% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.56% | 3.18% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.27% | 4.66% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 8.70% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 8.70% | +2.97% |
RISR vs. IRVH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISR has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IRVH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISR vs. IRVH - Dividend Comparison
RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than IRVH's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.31% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% | 0.00% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 5.87% | 5.95% | 5.67% | 7.96% | 4.26% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISR and IRVH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RISR has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to IRVH (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISR dropped -14.31% vs IRVH's -14.98%.
On 3-year performance, RISR leads with 10.84% vs 0.11% for IRVH. On fees, IRVH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RISR has performed better with a 10.84% return vs 0.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRVH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.
RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 5.31% for IRVH.
RISR is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while IRVH is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for RISR and 0.50% for IRVH.
RISR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RISR and IRVH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer