RISR vs. IRVH
RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond, while IRVH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RISR returned 11.28%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for IRVH. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. RISR charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IRVH.
Performance
RISR vs. IRVH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RISR achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than IRVH's -4.36% return.
RISR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRVH
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -4.36%
- 6M
- -4.00%
- 1Y
- -2.13%
- 3Y*
- 0.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RISR vs. IRVH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 2.99% | 4.63% | 24.20% | 7.02% | 1.24% |
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -4.36% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 0.83% | -6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISR and IRVH is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2022 | -0.27 |
The correlation between RISR and IRVH shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (all time) to 0.03 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISR vs. IRVH — Risk / Return Rank
RISR
IRVH
RISR vs. IRVH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RISR | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.93 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | -0.36 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | -0.82 | +5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RISR vs. IRVH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISR drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, roughly equal to the maximum IRVH drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISR and IRVH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISR | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -14.98% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -5.96% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.07% | -8.03% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -11.28% | +10.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -9.72% | +7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 2.60% | -1.50% |
Volatility
RISR vs. IRVH - Volatility Comparison
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) at 1.09%. This indicates that RISR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISR | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.09% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.95% | 3.35% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.40% | 4.85% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 8.80% | +2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 8.80% | +2.99% |
RISR vs. IRVH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISR has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IRVH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISR vs. IRVH - Dividend Comparison
RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than IRVH's 5.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.62% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% | 0.00% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 5.92% | 5.95% | 5.67% | 7.96% | 4.26% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISR and IRVH have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RISR has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to IRVH (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISR dropped -14.31% vs IRVH's -14.98%.
On 3-year performance, RISR leads with 11.28% vs 0.01% for IRVH. On fees, IRVH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RISR has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRVH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.
RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 5.62% for IRVH.
RISR is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while IRVH is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for RISR and 0.50% for IRVH.
RISR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RISR and IRVH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer