RISR vs. CLOA

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and CLOA (BlackRock AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond, while CLOA is a CLO fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RISR returned 10.98%/yr vs 6.62%/yr for CLOA. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RISR charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CLOA.

Performance

RISR vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RISR achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly higher than CLOA's 2.15% return.

RISR

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: 3.07%
• 6M: 3.20%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: 10.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.54%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 6.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RISR vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF	3.07%	4.63%	24.20%	9.25%
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF	2.15%	5.44%	7.25%	8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RISR and CLOA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023	0.02

Return for Risk

RISR vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RISR

RISR Risk / Return Rank: 31
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

CLOA

CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 99
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RISR vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RISR	CLOA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	7.39	-6.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	13.73	-12.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	3.33	-2.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	29.15	-27.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	145.81	-141.49

RISR vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RISR Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 7.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RISR and CLOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RISR vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISR drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISR and CLOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RISR	CLOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-1.34%	-12.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.61%	-0.18%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.07%	-1.13%	-6.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	0.00%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-0.05%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.04%	+1.06%

Volatility

RISR vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) at 0.13%. This indicates that RISR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RISR	CLOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	0.13%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.98%	0.48%	+3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.45%	0.70%	+4.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.82%	1.31%	+10.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.82%	1.31%	+10.51%

RISR vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISR has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RISR vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than CLOA's 4.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF	4.95%	5.35%	6.01%	5.88%	0.00%	0.00%
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF	5.91%	5.95%	5.67%	7.96%	4.26%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RISR and CLOA in my portfolio?

RISR and CLOA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RISR or CLOA?

RISR has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to CLOA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISR dropped -14.31% vs CLOA's -1.34%.

Which ETF is better, RISR or CLOA?

On 3-year performance, RISR leads with 10.98% vs 6.62% for CLOA. On fees, CLOA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CLOA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RISR or CLOA?

Over the 3-year period, RISR has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RISR or CLOA?

CLOA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RISR or CLOA?

RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 4.95% for CLOA.

What is the main difference between RISR and CLOA?

RISR is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while CLOA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for RISR and 0.20% for CLOA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.39 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.