RISN vs. PRPFX
RISN (Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF) and PRPFX (Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, RISN returned 4.81%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for PRPFX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RISN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for PRPFX.
Performance
RISN vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RISN having a 6.81% return and PRPFX slightly higher at 6.99%.
RISN
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- —
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
RISN vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF | 6.81% | 10.83% | 7.61% | 10.29% | -18.06% | 22.47% | 7.73% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 6.99% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 11.96% | -5.48% | 10.87% | 13.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISN and PRPFX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between RISN and PRPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISN vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank
RISN
PRPFX
RISN vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RISN | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.03 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 2.48 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 3.06 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | 8.59 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RISN | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.03 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.04 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.80 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
RISN vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISN drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, smaller than the maximum PRPFX drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISN and PRPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISN | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -27.16% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.42% | -8.10% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -8.19% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -15.49% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.29% | +4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -3.52% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.89% | -0.70% |
Volatility
RISN vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) at 2.70%. This indicates that RISN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISN | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 2.70% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 11.23% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 12.50% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.18% | 11.06% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 10.62% | +0.73% |
RISN vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISN vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison
RISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than PRPFX's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 3.05% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.39% | 2.05% | 1.27% | 9.74% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISN and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RISN has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to PRPFX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISN dropped -21.88% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.
PRPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RISN and PRPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer