PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RISN vs. ASET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RISN vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RISN

1D
-0.29%
1M
4.49%
YTD
6.51%
6M
4.83%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*

ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RISN vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison


RISN vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RISN
ASET

Industrials

27.1%
16.3%

Financial Services

22.2%

-

Technology

18.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
0.1%

Energy

6.8%
7.8%

Healthcare

4.5%
2.2%

Communication Services

4.0%
12.1%

Basic Materials

2.7%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
1.1%

Real Estate

-

41.6%

Utilities

-

12.8%

Industrials

RISN
27.1%
ASET
16.3%

Financial Services

RISN
22.2%
ASET

-

Technology

RISN
18.6%
ASET
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RISN
10.9%
ASET
0.1%

Energy

RISN
6.8%
ASET
7.8%

Healthcare

RISN
4.5%
ASET
2.2%

Communication Services

RISN
4.0%
ASET
12.1%

Basic Materials

RISN
2.7%
ASET
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

RISN
2.6%
ASET
1.1%

Real Estate

RISN

-

ASET
41.6%

Utilities

RISN

-

ASET
12.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RISN vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RISN
RISN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RISN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RISN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ASET
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RISN vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RISNASETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

RISN vs. ASET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RISNASETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

Drawdowns

RISN vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISN drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISN and ASET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RISNASETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

0.00%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

0.00%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

0.00%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

Volatility

RISN vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RISNASETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

0.00%

+11.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.18%

0.00%

+11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

0.00%

+11.34%

RISN vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

RISN vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

RISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
1.03%0.98%1.39%2.05%1.27%9.74%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for RISN.

RISN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for RISN and 0.57% for ASET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RISN and ASET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer