PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RISE.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RISE.L (iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - RISE.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RISE.L returned 4.64%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for ISAC.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RISE.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.

Performance

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (RISE.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RISE.L is traded in GBp, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RISE.L achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 12.06% return.

RISE.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.26%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.50%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
—

ISAC.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.06%
6M
12.30%
1Y
30.14%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RISE.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF		1.29%5.86%5.76%7.62%-3.13%4.04%14.09%13.14%2.07%3.75%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		11.99%13.64%19.87%16.44%-8.43%19.97%12.26%20.98%-4.37%13.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RISE.L and ISAC.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016

0.41

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RISE.L
ISAC.L

Financial Services

100.0%
17.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Communication Services

-

8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Energy

-

3.6%

Healthcare

-

7.8%

Industrials

-

9.0%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

33.9%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Financial Services

RISE.L
100.0%
ISAC.L
17.3%

Basic Materials

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
2.9%

Communication Services

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
4.4%

Energy

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
3.6%

Healthcare

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
7.8%

Industrials

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
9.0%

Real Estate

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
1.2%

Technology

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
33.9%

Utilities

RISE.L

-

ISAC.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with RISE.L:
RISE.L vs. CRHG.LRISE.L vs. SPHYRISE.L vs. HYGRISE.L vs. HYUS.LRISE.L vs. FAHY.LRISE.L vs. SDHY.LRISE.L vs. STHY.L
Often compared with ISAC.L:
ISAC.L vs. VWRA.LISAC.L vs. SSAC.LISAC.L vs. IWDA.LISAC.L vs. VTISAC.L vs. SWDA.LISAC.L vs. VOOISAC.L vs. SWRD.L

Return for Risk

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RISE.L
RISE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RISE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RISE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (RISE.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RISE.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.00
2.52

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.01
3.48

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.48

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

4.36

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.87

16.74

-5.88

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RISE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RISE.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RISE.LISAC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.52

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.88

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.87

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Drawdowns

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISE.L and ISAC.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RISE.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-25.84%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-6.88%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.65%

-18.33%

+11.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.05%

-18.33%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.84%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.36%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-3.56%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.80%

-0.90%

Volatility

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (RISE.L) is 1.24%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that RISE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RISE.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

3.74%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.62%

9.25%

-5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90%

11.90%

-7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

14.29%

-7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.83%

15.49%

-6.66%

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RISE.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

RISE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISE.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF		8.29%6.61%6.89%6.13%5.06%4.52%4.96%5.81%6.42%5.91%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

RISE.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RISE.L.

RISE.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. RISE.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RISE.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RISE.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer