PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIRGX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIRGX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class R6 (RIRGX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIRGX achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 14.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RIRGX having a 8.08% annualized return and MHELX not far ahead at 8.35%.


RIRGX

1D
0.74%
1M
1.61%
6M
7.10%
YTD
10.56%
1Y
19.19%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
8.08%
ALL TIME*
7.87%

MHELX

1D
-1.73%
1M
-5.11%
6M
9.53%
YTD
14.91%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
8.35%
ALL TIME*
7.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RIRGX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIRGX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class R6
10.56%20.76%9.78%9.31%-6.85%15.39%3.31%17.61%-6.75%14.30%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
14.91%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RIRGX and MHELX is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between RIRGX and MHELX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIRGX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RIRGX
RIRGX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RIRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RIRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RIRGX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class R6 (RIRGX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIRGXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.26

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.10

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

9.86

+1.34

RIRGX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIRGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIRGX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIRGX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIRGX drawdown since its inception was -25.25%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIRGX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIRGXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.25%

-61.24%

+35.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.52%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.88%

-30.81%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.45%

-32.01%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.25%

-39.02%

+13.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.13%

+6.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-12.87%

+9.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.68%

-1.07%

Volatility

RIRGX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class R6 (RIRGX) is 1.96%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that RIRGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIRGXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

4.12%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.56%

12.84%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

19.69%

-11.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.99%

21.04%

-11.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

20.95%

-10.17%

RIRGX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIRGX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIRGX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

RIRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than MHELX's 6.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.28%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%
RIRGX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class R6
7.41%8.03%5.35%3.79%3.77%3.46%3.49%4.41%4.12%4.73%2.88%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIRGX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to RIRGX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIRGX dropped -25.25% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

RIRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIRGX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer