PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIOX vs. VRTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIOX vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIOX achieves a 135.89% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 167.32% return.


RIOX

1D
-20.99%
1M
1.77%
YTD
135.89%
6M
52.58%
1Y
157.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VRTL

1D
-14.78%
1M
-33.02%
YTD
167.32%
6M
90.02%
1Y
338.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIOX vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RIOX and VRTL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.50

The correlation between RIOX and VRTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIOX vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIOX
RIOX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
RIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTL
VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIOX vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIOXVRTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

7.18

-5.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

18.12

-15.00

RIOX vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the VRTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIOX and VRTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIOXVRTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.95

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

2.58

-2.60

Drawdowns

RIOX vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIOX drawdown since its inception was -84.40%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIOX and VRTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOXVRTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.40%

-60.58%

-23.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.40%

-47.45%

-36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.36%

-38.62%

-4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.49%

-15.28%

-37.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.67%

18.77%

+31.90%

Volatility

RIOX vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) has a higher volatility of 37.03% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) at 34.92%. This indicates that RIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOXVRTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.03%

34.92%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

123.63%

89.21%

+34.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

169.32%

115.48%

+53.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.45%

124.93%

+43.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.45%

124.93%

+43.52%

RIOX vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIOX vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

RIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.76%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIOX and VRTL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIOX has higher volatility (37.03%) compared to VRTL (34.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIOX dropped -84.40% vs VRTL's -60.58%.

On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 338.19% vs 157.33% for RIOX. On fees, RIOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, VRTL has been the lower-risk option at 34.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 338.19% return vs 157.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RIOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

RIOX has the higher dividend yield at 25.76%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RIOX and 1.50% for VRTL.

VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIOX and VRTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer