PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIOX vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIOX vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIOX achieves a 43.74% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 33.62% return.


RIOX

1D
12.01%
1M
-18.63%
6M
8.15%
YTD
43.74%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-16.14%

QTUM

1D
3.36%
1M
-5.82%
6M
25.52%
YTD
33.62%
1Y
63.01%
3Y*
42.90%
5Y*
25.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$54.81M$58.16M$111.60M
$4.76M$4.01M$9.98M

RIOX vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RIOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF
43.74%-47.32%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
33.62%34.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RIOX and QTUM is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.65

The correlation between RIOX and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIOX vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RIOX
RIOX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RIOX vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOXQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

2.94

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

10.67

-10.29

RIOX vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIOX and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIOX vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIOX drawdown since its inception was -84.40%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIOX and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOXQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.40%

-38.45%

-45.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.40%

-21.51%

-62.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.48%

-13.35%

-52.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.15%

-8.27%

-43.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.49%

5.92%

+47.57%

Volatility

RIOX vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) has a higher volatility of 67.92% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 11.63%. This indicates that RIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOXQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

67.92%

11.63%

+56.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

131.27%

26.50%

+104.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

176.83%

31.77%

+145.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

173.63%

27.74%

+145.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

173.63%

27.70%

+145.93%

RIOX vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIOX vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

RIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.27%, more than QTUM's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.81%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%
RIOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF
42.27%60.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIOX and QTUM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIOX has higher volatility (67.92%) compared to QTUM (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIOX dropped -84.40% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 63.01% vs 20.12% for RIOX. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 11.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 63.01% return vs 20.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RIOX.

RIOX has the higher dividend yield at 42.27%, compared with 0.81% for QTUM.

RIOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RIOX and 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIOX and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer