RIO vs. MFC
RIO (Rio Tinto Group) and MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation) are both stocks. RIO operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while MFC operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RIO returned 21.75%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for MFC. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIO vs. MFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 29.64% return, which is significantly higher than MFC's 9.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed MFC with an annualized return of 21.75%, while MFC has yielded a comparatively lower 15.88% annualized return.
RIO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 29.64%
- 6M
- 42.09%
- 1Y
- 80.02%
- 3Y*
- 23.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 21.75%
MFC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 32.27%
- 5Y*
- 19.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.88%
RIO vs. MFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 29.64% | 44.47% | -15.36% | 11.06% | 18.48% | -3.67% | 36.22% | 33.18% | -2.93% | 44.87% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 9.27% | 22.95% | 45.75% | 31.13% | -1.18% | 12.17% | -7.18% | 49.19% | -29.89% | 22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIO and MFC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 1999 | 0.44 |
The correlation between RIO and MFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RIO:
$165.37B
MFC:
$46.97B
RIO:
$13.11
MFC:
$4.06
RIO:
7.70
MFC:
9.59
RIO:
1.48
MFC:
0.78
RIO:
2.66
MFC:
1.07
RIO:
$111.41B
MFC:
$79.35B
RIO:
$31.10B
MFC:
$26.46B
RIO:
$40.42B
MFC:
$8.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIO vs. MFC — Risk / Return Rank
RIO
MFC
RIO vs. MFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIO | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.22 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.30 | 1.98 | +3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.21 | 5.41 | +14.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIO | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 1.19 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.80 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.56 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.34 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
RIO vs. MFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than MFC's maximum drawdown of -83.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and MFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIO | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.97% | -83.61% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -12.49% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -16.75% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.25% | -26.99% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.47% | -57.44% | +19.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.92% | -1.95% | -7.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.77% | -29.41% | +5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 4.64% | -0.67% |
Volatility
RIO vs. MFC - Volatility Comparison
Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 11.37% compared to Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) at 7.84%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIO | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.37% | 7.84% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.90% | 15.82% | +8.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.93% | 20.72% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.23% | 24.13% | +5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.63% | 28.42% | +2.21% |
Dividends
RIO vs. MFC - Dividend Comparison
RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than MFC's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.43% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 3.98% | 4.66% | 7.40% | 5.40% | 10.48% | 10.23% | 5.13% | 7.68% | 6.32% | 4.47% | 3.93% | 7.58% |
Financials
RIO vs. MFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIO vs. MFC - Profitability Comparison
RIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
MFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.31B and revenue of 12.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
RIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
MFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
RIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
MFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIO and MFC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIO has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to MFC (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs MFC's -83.61%.
RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIO and MFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer