PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO vs. CM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO vs. CM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than CM's 31.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RIO having a 18.86% annualized return and CM not far behind at 18.25%.


RIO

1D
-1.20%
1M
-11.00%
6M
7.55%
YTD
14.41%
1Y
54.91%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
18.86%
ALL TIME*
11.71%

CM

1D
-2.84%
1M
6.17%
6M
29.47%
YTD
31.96%
1Y
65.91%
3Y*
45.62%
5Y*
21.86%
10Y*
18.25%
ALL TIME*
13.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO vs. CM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
14.41%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
31.96%49.02%37.83%27.23%-25.71%42.29%9.25%19.22%-19.75%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO and CM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 1997

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO:

$144.65B

CM:

$109.15B

EPS

RIO:

$13.11

CM:

CA$12.14

PE Ratio

RIO:

6.79

CM:

13.59

PS Ratio

RIO:

1.31

CM:

2.16

PB Ratio

RIO:

2.35

CM:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO:

$111.41B

CM:

CA$61.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO:

$31.10B

CM:

CA$28.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO:

$40.42B

CM:

CA$13.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO vs. CM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CM
CM Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO vs. CM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOCMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.55

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

6.14

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

23.92

-15.33

RIO vs. CM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the CM Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and CM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIO vs. CM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than CM's maximum drawdown of -71.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and CM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-71.70%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.74%

-10.79%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-19.47%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-40.61%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

-47.82%

+10.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.50%

-2.84%

-17.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-14.61%

-9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

2.76%

+3.65%

Volatility

RIO vs. CM - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 6.12%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

6.12%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.96%

16.61%

+8.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.72%

19.68%

+10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.33%

21.46%

+7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.42%

22.62%

+7.80%

Dividends

RIO vs. CM - Dividend Comparison

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than CM's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.55%3.17%4.21%5.88%7.77%4.08%5.06%6.47%5.48%5.28%5.93%6.71%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
4.51%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

RIO vs. CM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
30.65B
15.22B
(RIO) Total Revenue
(CM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RIO values in USD, CM values in CAD

RIO vs. CM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rio Tinto Group and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
26.6%
48.4%
Portfolio components
RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

CM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

CM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

CM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIO and CM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIO has higher volatility (8.38%) compared to CM (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs CM's -71.70%.

CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO and CM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer