RINT vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Russell, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. RINT is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, RINT returned 22.58% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. RINT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

RINT vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINT achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.

RINT

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 6M: 8.01%
• 1Y: 22.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINT vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	8.14%	15.69%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RINT and IBID is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

RINT vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINT

RINT Risk / Return Rank: 46
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 47

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINT vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RINT	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	3.19	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	5.38	-3.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.72	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	7.20	-5.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.15	29.14	-21.99

RINT vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RINT vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINT	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-1.28%	-10.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-0.55%	-11.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-0.55%	-1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-0.22%	-1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	0.13%	+3.03%

Volatility

RINT vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that RINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINT	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	0.35%	+4.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	0.86%	+12.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.27%	1.23%	+14.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.93%	2.24%	+12.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	2.24%	+12.69%

RINT vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINT vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	0.82%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINT and IBID in my portfolio?

RINT and IBID have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RINT or IBID?

RINT has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, RINT or IBID?

On 1-year performance, RINT leads with 22.58% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RINT or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, RINT has performed better with a 22.58% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINT or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINT or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.

What is the main difference between RINT and IBID?

RINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Russell and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.