RINT vs. EVYM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) and EVYM (Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Russell, while EVYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RINT returned 25.05% vs 9.32% for EVYM. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RINT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EVYM.

Performance

RINT vs. EVYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINT achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than EVYM's 2.93% return.

RINT

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: 6.25%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 1Y: 25.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.16%

EVYM

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.80%
• 6M: 2.06%
• YTD: 2.93%
• 1Y: 9.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF	$307.45K	$279.52K	$272.70K
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	$631.20K	$544.70K	$524.60K

RINT vs. EVYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	11.48%	15.69%
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF	2.93%	5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between RINT and EVYM is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

RINT vs. EVYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RINT

RINT Risk / Return Rank: 61
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 61

EVYM

EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 90
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RINT vs. EVYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RINT	EVYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.56	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.82	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.51	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	3.38	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.01	13.61	-5.59

RINT vs. EVYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the EVYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and EVYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RINT vs. EVYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, which is greater than EVYM's maximum drawdown of -6.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and EVYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINT	EVYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-6.08%	-5.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-2.77%	-9.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-1.80%	+1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-1.38%	-0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	0.69%	+2.44%

Volatility

RINT vs. EVYM - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) at 1.14%. This indicates that RINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINT	EVYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	1.14%	+3.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	2.87%	+10.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.45%	3.66%	+11.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.88%	5.86%	+9.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.88%	5.86%	+9.02%

RINT vs. EVYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EVYM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINT vs. EVYM - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than EVYM's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF	4.88%	3.72%
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	0.80%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINT and EVYM in my portfolio?

RINT and EVYM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RINT or EVYM?

RINT has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to EVYM (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs EVYM's -6.08%.

Which ETF is better, RINT or EVYM?

On 1-year performance, RINT leads with 25.05% vs 9.32% for EVYM. On fees, EVYM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EVYM has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RINT or EVYM?

Over the 1-year period, RINT has performed better with a 25.05% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINT or EVYM?

EVYM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINT or EVYM?

EVYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 0.80% for RINT.

What is the main difference between RINT and EVYM?

RINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EVYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Russell and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 0.40% for EVYM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.