PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RINT vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RINT vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINT achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly higher than BUFI's 4.92% return.


RINT

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.99%
YTD
8.39%
6M
11.05%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFI

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.83%
YTD
4.92%
6M
6.32%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINT vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RINT and BUFI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025

0.94

The correlation between RINT and BUFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RINT vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINT
RINT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINT vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RINTBUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.26

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

8.98

-2.04

RINT vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the BUFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and BUFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RINTBUFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.72

1.50

+0.22

Drawdowns

RINT vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RINTBUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-7.43%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-5.69%

-6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.32%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-0.86%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

1.43%

+1.73%

Volatility

RINT vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) at 2.20%. This indicates that RINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RINTBUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

2.20%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

7.05%

+5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

8.43%

+6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

9.15%

+5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

9.15%

+5.49%

RINT vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

RINT vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RINT and BUFI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RINT has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to BUFI (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs BUFI's -7.43%.

On 1-year performance, RINT leads with 21.90% vs 12.80% for BUFI. On fees, RINT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BUFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RINT has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RINT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

RINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

RINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Russell and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 0.69% for BUFI.

BUFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RINT and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer