PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RINT vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RINT vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINT achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


RINT

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.15%
6M
5.35%
YTD
8.78%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINT vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RINT and BITI is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

-0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RINT vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINT
RINT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINT vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RINTBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.72

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

6.78

-0.57

RINT vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RINT vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RINTBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-92.16%

+80.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-25.28%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-85.94%

+84.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-68.34%

+66.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

10.11%

-6.94%

Volatility

RINT vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is 4.65%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that RINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RINTBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

11.38%

-6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

34.25%

-21.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

44.14%

-28.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

52.28%

-37.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

52.28%

-37.42%

RINT vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RINT vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
RINT
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
0.82%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RINT and BITI have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to RINT (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 68.34% vs 19.67% for RINT. On fees, RINT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, RINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 68.34% return vs 19.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RINT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.

RINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Russell and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RINT and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer