RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RING.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications Index ETF) and QQCL.TO (Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RING.TO is a Communications Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while QQCL.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RING.TO returned -8.67% vs 34.98% for QQCL.TO. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications Index ETF (RING.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING.TO achieves a -8.72% return, which is significantly lower than QQCL.TO's 19.53% return.

RING.TO

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -10.93%
• 6M: -9.56%
• YTD: -8.72%
• 1Y: -8.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQCL.TO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -2.25%
• 6M: 16.74%
• YTD: 19.53%
• 1Y: 34.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RING.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications Index ETF	-8.72%	10.75%	-9.24%
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	19.53%	13.10%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RING.TO and QQCL.TO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024	-0.13

Return for Risk

RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING.TO

RING.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4
RING.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
RING.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
RING.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
RING.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
RING.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QQCL.TO

QQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
QQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
QQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications Index ETF (RING.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RING.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	1.90	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	2.51	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.34	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	3.28	-3.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	11.66	-13.08

RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RING.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING.TO and QQCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.62%, smaller than the maximum QQCL.TO drawdown of -25.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING.TO and QQCL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RING.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.62%	-25.63%	+5.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.49%	-10.70%	-6.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.76%	-3.73%	-11.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-3.28%	-3.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	3.01%	+3.12%

Volatility

RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications Index ETF (RING.TO) is 6.61%, while Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that RING.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RING.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.61%	7.29%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.24%	15.50%	-3.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	18.45%	-3.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	20.82%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	20.82%	-4.12%

Dividends

RING.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

RING.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, less than QQCL.TO's 13.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	13.50%	14.54%	11.87%	3.68%
RING.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Telecommunications Index ETF	6.41%	6.32%	1.25%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RING.TO and QQCL.TO in my portfolio?

RING.TO and QQCL.TO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between RING.TO and QQCL.TO?

RING.TO is categorized as Communications Equities, while QQCL.TO is Nasdaq-100.