PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RINF vs. LTPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RINF vs. LTPZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ).

RINF and LTPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RINF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. Both RINF and LTPZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RINF vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RINF vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RINF
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF		-0.74%1.64%9.79%0.21%8.77%16.20%1.98%1.82%-0.79%-1.70%
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF		-1.39%4.00%-4.80%0.96%-31.71%7.02%24.89%17.47%-7.22%9.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RINF has outperformed LTPZ with an annualized return of 4.19%, while LTPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.59% annualized return.

RINF

1D
0.07%
1M
0.56%
YTD
-0.74%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
0.79%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
4.19%

LTPZ

1D
-0.10%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
-2.84%
1Y
-2.68%
3Y*
-2.37%
5Y*
-4.68%
10Y*
0.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF

PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF

Often compared with RINF:
RINF vs. COMM.LRINF vs. TUARINF vs. TYARINF vs. IEFRINF vs. SPYRINF vs. STIPRINF vs. TIPZ
Often compared with LTPZ:
LTPZ vs. SCHPLTPZ vs. TLTLTPZ vs. TIPXLTPZ vs. VTIPLTPZ vs. VGLTLTPZ vs. HYSLTPZ vs. JNK

RINF vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.

RINF
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF

Return for Risk

RINF vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RINF
RINF Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINF Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
LTPZ
LTPZ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LTPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LTPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINF vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RINFLTPZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.15

-0.24

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

-0.24

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.97

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

-0.21

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.84

-0.43

+1.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RINF vs. LTPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINF Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is higher than the LTPZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINF and LTPZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RINFLTPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

-0.24

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.30

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.04

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.21

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between RINF and LTPZ is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RINF vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison

RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than LTPZ's 4.64% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RINF
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF		3.82%3.89%4.68%5.07%1.15%2.76%0.82%1.90%2.47%2.99%1.09%1.83%
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF		4.64%4.64%3.71%3.71%8.38%3.56%1.42%1.74%3.05%2.25%2.32%0.71%

Drawdowns

RINF vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than LTPZ's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and LTPZ.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RINFLTPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-40.99%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-7.82%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.58%

-40.99%

+27.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.18%

-40.99%

+11.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-33.95%

+32.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.65%

-12.19%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

3.92%

-2.48%

Volatility

RINF vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) is 1.22%, while PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that RINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RINFLTPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

3.99%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

6.46%

-3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.45%

11.28%

-5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.96%

15.92%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

15.10%

-2.44%