RINF vs. LTPZ
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index while LTPZ tracks the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RINF returned 4.69%/yr vs -0.11%/yr for LTPZ. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RINF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LTPZ.
Performance
RINF vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -2.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RINF has outperformed LTPZ with an annualized return of 4.69%, while LTPZ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.11% annualized return.
RINF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.99%
LTPZ
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- -2.19%
- 3Y*
- -0.90%
- 5Y*
- -7.12%
- 10Y*
- -0.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.10M | $9.30M | $8.08M | |
| $105.36K | $112.30K | $130.83K |
RINF vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 2.82% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | 8.77% | 16.20% | 1.98% | 1.82% | -0.79% | -1.70% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF | -2.82% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 24.89% | 17.47% | -7.22% | 9.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and LTPZ is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012 | 0.02 |
The correlation between RINF and LTPZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (3 years) to 0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
LTPZ
RINF vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RINF | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.27 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | -0.56 | +4.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RINF vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than LTPZ's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and LTPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -40.99% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -8.09% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -12.64% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | -40.99% | +27.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | -40.99% | +11.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -34.91% | +34.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -12.61% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 3.92% | -3.00% |
Volatility
RINF vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) is 1.51%, while PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that RINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 2.20% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 6.79% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 9.01% | -4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 15.86% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 15.02% | -2.48% |
RINF vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
RINF vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than LTPZ's 6.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF | 6.96% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.65% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and LTPZ have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTPZ has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to RINF (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs LTPZ's -40.99%.
On 10-year performance, RINF leads with 4.69% vs -0.11% for LTPZ. On fees, LTPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RINF has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RINF has performed better with a 4.69% return vs -0.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LTPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.96%, compared with 3.65% for RINF.
RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RINF and 0.20% for LTPZ.
RINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINF and LTPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer