RINC vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. RINC charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

RINC vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINC vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-5.74%	1.71%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-5.44%	9.67%	-4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RINC and BNO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023	-0.01

The correlation between RINC and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RINC vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINC vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RINC	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.14	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RINC	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-87.06%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-10.29%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-40.17%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RINC	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	41.46%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	35.38%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	36.68%	—

RINC vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINC vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

RINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	2.16%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINC and BNO in my portfolio?

RINC and BNO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RINC or BNO?

On fees, RINC is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINC or BNO?

RINC is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINC or BNO?

RINC has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between RINC and BNO?

RINC is categorized as REIT, while BNO is Oil & Gas. RINC tracks Gapstow Real Estate Income Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RINC and 0.90% for BNO.