PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIGS vs. YLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIGS vs. YLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than YLD's 2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed YLD with an annualized return of 3.15%, while YLD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.80% annualized return.


RIGS

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.76%
6M
0.41%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
3.15%

YLD

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.47%
YTD
2.83%
6M
3.33%
1Y
7.36%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
5.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIGS vs. YLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIGS
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
0.76%4.63%4.45%6.07%-5.72%1.93%3.58%7.60%-0.11%4.48%
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
2.83%6.55%9.19%12.93%-8.78%9.17%1.50%13.58%-3.30%9.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RIGS and YLD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015

0.30

The correlation between RIGS and YLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIGS vs. YLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIGS
RIGS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RIGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIGS Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
RIGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

YLD
YLD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
YLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
YLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIGS vs. YLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIGSYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.32

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

3.74

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

12.96

-10.90

RIGS vs. YLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the YLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIGS and YLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIGSYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

1.71

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.75

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.71

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.65

-0.19

Drawdowns

RIGS vs. YLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum YLD drawdown of -28.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and YLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIGSYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-28.34%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

-1.98%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.18%

-5.62%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.03%

-13.89%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.31%

-28.34%

+13.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.37%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-2.70%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.57%

+1.33%

Volatility

RIGS vs. YLD - Volatility Comparison

RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) have volatilities of 1.32% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIGSYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.32%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

3.51%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.33%

4.34%

+4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

6.40%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.75%

8.21%

-0.46%

RIGS vs. YLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than YLD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIGS vs. YLD - Dividend Comparison

RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than YLD's 7.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIGS
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
4.88%4.84%4.49%3.48%2.71%2.47%3.77%3.87%4.54%4.45%4.46%3.61%
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
7.27%7.33%7.12%6.46%6.51%3.92%4.40%4.81%5.42%6.28%4.47%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIGS and YLD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YLD has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to RIGS (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGS dropped -15.31% vs YLD's -28.34%.

On 10-year performance, YLD leads with 5.80% vs 3.15% for RIGS. On fees, YLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YLD has performed better with a 5.80% return vs 3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for RIGS.

YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 4.88% for RIGS.

They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RIGS and 0.39% for YLD.

YLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIGS and YLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer