RIGS vs. HYHG
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG).
RIGS and HYHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. HYHG is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on May 21, 2013.
Performance
RIGS vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.35% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 0.77% | 5.31% | 11.41% | 14.69% | -1.71% | 5.75% | 0.16% | 12.02% | -1.95% | 3.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed HYHG with an annualized return of 3.34%, while HYHG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.30% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 6.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
HYHG
RIGS vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.86 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 1.29 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.77 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 8.44 | -6.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.86 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.81 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.69 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and HYHG is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than HYHG's 6.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.92% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and HYHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -25.71% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -3.03% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -9.21% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -25.71% | +10.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -0.55% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -3.08% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 0.89% | +1.16% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 2.20%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 2.35% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.84% | 4.48% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 8.09% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 8.12% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 9.20% | -1.46% |