RIGS vs. FTSL
RIGS (RiverFront Strategic Income Fund) and FTSL (First Trust Senior Loan Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RIGS returned 3.15%/yr vs 4.45%/yr for FTSL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIGS charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTSL.
Performance
RIGS vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly higher than FTSL's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed FTSL with an annualized return of 3.15%, while FTSL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.45% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
FTSL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
RIGS vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.76% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 0.62% | 5.98% | 8.27% | 11.58% | -2.50% | 3.94% | 2.99% | 10.11% | -1.30% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and FTSL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.22 |
The correlation between RIGS and FTSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
FTSL
RIGS vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 2.15 | -1.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 3.35 | -2.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.51 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.95 | -1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 7.25 | -5.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.15 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.50 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.86 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.85 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum FTSL drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and FTSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -22.67% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -2.33% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.18% | -2.66% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -6.96% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -22.67% | +7.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.03% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -0.76% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 0.63% | +1.27% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) at 0.36%. This indicates that RIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 0.36% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.74% | 1.95% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.33% | 2.11% | +7.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 3.35% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 5.19% | +2.56% |
RIGS vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIGS vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than FTSL's 6.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.46% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.88% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIGS and FTSL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIGS has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to FTSL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGS dropped -15.31% vs FTSL's -22.67%.
On 10-year performance, FTSL leads with 4.45% vs 3.15% for RIGS. On fees, RIGS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FTSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTSL has performed better with a 4.45% return vs 3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RIGS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 4.88% for RIGS.
They also come from different issuers: SS&C and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RIGS and 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIGS and FTSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer