RIGS vs. FTSL
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL).
RIGS and FTSL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. FTSL is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on May 1, 2013.
Performance
RIGS vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.29% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | -0.69% | 5.98% | 8.27% | 11.58% | -2.50% | 3.94% | 2.99% | 10.11% | -1.30% | 2.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than FTSL's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed FTSL with an annualized return of 3.30%, while FTSL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.50% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
FTSL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
FTSL
RIGS vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.56 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 2.05 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.42 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 2.06 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 7.37 | -5.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.56 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.46 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.87 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.83 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and FTSL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than FTSL's 6.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.58% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum FTSL drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and FTSL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -22.67% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -2.33% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -6.96% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -22.67% | +7.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -1.13% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -0.77% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 0.65% | +1.39% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) at 1.36%. This indicates that RIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 1.36% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 1.91% | +4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 3.11% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 3.36% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 5.19% | +2.56% |