RIGS vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RIGS (RiverFront Strategic Income Fund) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RIGS is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by SS&C, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. RIGS is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RIGS returned 3.15%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for DBO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIGS charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

RIGS vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 3.15%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.

RIGS

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: 3.15%

DBO

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 84.75%
• 6M: 81.10%
• 1Y: 80.26%
• 3Y*: 21.86%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIGS vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund	0.76%	4.63%	4.45%	6.07%	-5.72%	1.93%	3.58%	7.60%	-0.11%	4.48%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	84.75%	-11.71%	7.85%	-4.44%	13.04%	60.74%	-20.99%	28.05%	-15.22%	4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RIGS and DBO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013	0.11

The correlation between RIGS and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RIGS vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIGS

RIGS Risk / Return Rank: 17
RIGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
RIGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RIGS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
RIGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
RIGS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIGS vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RIGS	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	2.34	-1.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	2.94	-2.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.38	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	4.44	-3.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.06	9.02	-6.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIGS vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIGS and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RIGS	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42	2.34	-1.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.50	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.36	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.02	+0.43

Drawdowns

RIGS vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIGS	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-90.18%	+74.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.55%	-18.19%	+13.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.18%	-28.20%	+23.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.03%	-37.68%	+28.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.31%	-61.69%	+46.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-51.38%	+49.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	-62.25%	+60.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	8.92%	-7.02%

Volatility

RIGS vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 1.32%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIGS	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	12.61%	-11.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.74%	28.20%	-23.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.33%	34.46%	-25.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.50%	32.29%	-24.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.75%	31.78%	-24.03%

RIGS vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIGS vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.90%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund	4.88%	4.84%	4.49%	3.48%	2.71%	2.47%	3.77%	3.87%	4.54%	4.45%	4.46%	3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIGS and DBO in my portfolio?

RIGS and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RIGS or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to RIGS (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGS dropped -15.31% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, RIGS or DBO?

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 3.15% for RIGS. On fees, RIGS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, RIGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RIGS or DBO?

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIGS or DBO?

RIGS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RIGS or DBO?

RIGS has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

What is the main difference between RIGS and DBO?

RIGS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RIGS and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.