RIGS vs. DADS
RIGS (RiverFront Strategic Income Fund) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIGS charges 0.48%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
RIGS vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.24% return.
RIGS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 3.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.22%
DADS
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RIGS vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.97% | 1.69% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.24% | -3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and DADS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
DADS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RIGS vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIGS | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum DADS drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -17.07% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -2.88% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -7.35% | +5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | — | — |
Volatility
RIGS vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.92% | 17.69% | -7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.67% | 17.69% | -10.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.81% | 17.69% | -9.88% |
RIGS vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIGS vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than DADS's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.77% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.85% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIGS and DADS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RIGS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RIGS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
RIGS has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 2.77% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RIGS and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for RIGS and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer