RIGS vs. BBHY
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY).
RIGS and BBHY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. BBHY is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. It was launched on Sep 15, 2016.
Performance
RIGS vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.05% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 6.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's -0.05% return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
BBHY
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
BBHY
RIGS vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.24 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 1.81 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.30 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.68 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 9.08 | -7.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.24 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.55 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.63 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and BBHY is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than BBHY's 7.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.14% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and BBHY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -24.98% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -4.34% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -15.32% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -1.04% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -2.41% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 0.80% | +1.25% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) have volatilities of 2.20% and 2.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 2.19% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 2.80% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 5.73% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 7.25% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 7.58% | +0.16% |