RIGS vs. ACES
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES).
RIGS and ACES are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. ACES is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018.
Performance
RIGS vs. ACES - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. ACES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.29% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | 1.08% |
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 3.39% | 25.44% | -26.71% | -20.04% | -28.44% | -19.44% | 140.33% | 51.70% | -9.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than ACES's 3.39% return.
RIGS
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
ACES
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 47.29%
- 3Y*
- -9.44%
- 5Y*
- -14.81%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. ACES - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than ACES's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. ACES — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
ACES
RIGS vs. ACES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.36 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 1.93 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.23 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 2.66 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 6.60 | -4.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.36 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.41 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.14 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and ACES is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. ACES - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than ACES's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 0.68% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.79% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. ACES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum ACES drawdown of -79.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and ACES.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -79.05% | +63.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -17.44% | +12.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -74.44% | +65.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -64.99% | +62.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -38.35% | +36.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 7.03% | -4.99% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. ACES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 2.34%, while ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 10.50% | -8.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 25.76% | -19.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 35.00% | -24.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 36.22% | -28.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 35.71% | -27.96% |