PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIGL vs. PAAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIGL vs. PAAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIGL achieves a -14.06% return, which is significantly higher than PAAS's -16.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGL has underperformed PAAS with an annualized return of 3.86%, while PAAS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.


RIGL

1D
-3.28%
1M
-3.87%
6M
5.59%
YTD
-14.06%
1Y
74.79%
3Y*
40.40%
5Y*
-1.65%
10Y*
3.86%
ALL TIME*
-10.60%

PAAS

1D
-2.09%
1M
-2.75%
6M
-20.58%
YTD
-16.30%
1Y
61.72%
3Y*
40.98%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$152.76M$168.96M$235.64M
$11.43M$14.01M$13.32M

RIGL vs. PAAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIGL
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-14.06%154.64%16.00%-3.33%-43.40%-24.29%63.55%-6.96%-40.72%63.03%
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
-16.30%160.40%26.61%2.50%-33.00%-26.78%46.88%63.86%-5.30%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RIGL and PAAS is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2000

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIGL:

$681.06M

PAAS:

$18.16B

EPS

RIGL:

$18.94

PAAS:

$3.12

PE Ratio

RIGL:

1.94

PAAS:

13.80

PEG Ratio

RIGL:

0.00

PAAS:

0.08

PS Ratio

RIGL:

2.36

PAAS:

4.37

PB Ratio

RIGL:

1.81

PAAS:

2.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIGL:

$299.77M

PAAS:

$4.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIGL:

$279.95M

PAAS:

$1.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIGL:

$125.80M

PAAS:

$2.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIGL vs. PAAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RIGL
RIGL Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RIGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIGL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RIGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIGL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PAAS
PAAS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PAAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RIGL vs. PAAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIGLPAASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.60

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

3.51

-0.99

RIGL vs. PAAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the PAAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIGL and PAAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIGL vs. PAAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIGL drawdown since its inception was -99.37%, which is greater than PAAS's maximum drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGL and PAAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIGLPAASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.37%

-85.10%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.08%

-38.84%

-11.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.76%

-38.84%

-11.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.85%

-57.39%

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.40%

-66.74%

-19.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.55%

-36.88%

-59.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.93%

-41.61%

-49.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.86%

17.65%

+12.21%

Volatility

RIGL vs. PAAS - Volatility Comparison

Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) have volatilities of 11.97% and 12.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIGLPAASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.97%

12.10%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.77%

43.93%

-9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.02%

56.24%

+13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.52%

48.23%

+37.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.76%

49.55%

+33.21%

Dividends

RIGL vs. PAAS - Dividend Comparison

RIGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
1.44%0.89%1.98%2.45%2.75%1.36%0.64%0.59%0.96%0.64%0.33%4.23%
RIGL
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RIGL vs. PAAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pan American Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RIGL vs. PAAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pan American Silver Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RIGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.21M and revenue of 58.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.2%.

PAAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 608.00M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.

RIGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.89M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

PAAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 560.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.5%.

RIGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 8.65M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

PAAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 457.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIGL and PAAS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAAS has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to RIGL (11.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGL dropped -99.37% vs PAAS's -85.10%.

PAAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIGL and PAAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer