RIG vs. EMEQ
RIG (Transocean Ltd.) is a stock, while EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Nomura. Over the past year, RIG returned 62.83% vs 92.60% for EMEQ. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RIG vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIG achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 43.28% return.
RIG
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 1Y
- 62.83%
- 3Y*
- -16.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- -7.67%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.47%
EMEQ
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -19.11%
- 6M
- 20.58%
- YTD
- 43.28%
- 1Y
- 92.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 59.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.87M | $9.22M | $11.55M | |
| $223.07M | $214.85M | $210.24M |
RIG vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RIG Transocean Ltd. | 19.85% | 10.13% | -9.42% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 43.28% | 69.78% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIG and EMEQ is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIG vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank
RIG
EMEQ
RIG vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIG | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 3.55 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 13.42 | -8.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIG vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIG drawdown since its inception was -99.47%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -26.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIG and EMEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIG | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.47% | -26.25% | -73.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.75% | -26.25% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.10% | -26.25% | -69.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.31% | -4.60% | -52.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.12% | 6.92% | +6.20% |
Volatility
RIG vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transocean Ltd. (RIG) is 11.84%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that RIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIG | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | 14.02% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.28% | 37.17% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.03% | 40.00% | +13.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.63% | 33.96% | +27.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.41% | 33.96% | +40.45% |
Dividends
RIG vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison
RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.93% | 2.76% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIG Transocean Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIG and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMEQ has higher volatility (14.02%) compared to RIG (11.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIG dropped -99.47% vs EMEQ's -26.25%.
EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIG and EMEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer