RIET vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RIET (Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIET is a REIT fund tracking the Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. RIET is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RIET returned 9.14%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for PIT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIET charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

RIET vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIET achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.

RIET

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 7.32%
• 6M: 7.05%
• 1Y: 12.20%
• 3Y*: 9.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 6M: 26.74%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 19.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIET vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF	7.32%	2.43%	1.18%	13.04%	-1.16%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	27.31%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RIET and PIT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	0.04

The correlation between RIET and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RIET vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIET

RIET Risk / Return Rank: 26
RIET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
RIET Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
RIET Omega Ratio Rank: 23
RIET Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RIET Martin Ratio Rank: 28

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIET vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIET	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.78	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	2.32	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.32	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	2.74	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	10.88	-7.24

RIET vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIET Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIET and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RIET vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIET drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIET and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIET	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.61%	-14.05%	-20.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-14.05%	+5.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-14.05%	-4.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.49%	-14.05%	+6.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.31%	-4.07%	-12.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.59%	-0.23%

Volatility

RIET vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) is 3.86%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that RIET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIET	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	4.67%	-0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.45%	19.36%	-9.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.29%	21.66%	-8.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	17.50%	+1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	17.50%	+1.45%

RIET vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIET has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIET vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

RIET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than PIT's 7.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.00%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%
RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF	10.86%	11.04%	10.17%	9.33%	9.33%	1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIET and PIT in my portfolio?

RIET and PIT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RIET or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to RIET (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIET dropped -34.61% vs PIT's -14.05%.

Which ETF is better, RIET or PIT?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.51% vs 9.14% for RIET. On fees, RIET is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RIET has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RIET or PIT?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIET or PIT?

RIET is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RIET or PIT?

RIET has the higher dividend yield at 10.86%, compared with 7.00% for PIT.

What is the main difference between RIET and PIT?

RIET is categorized as REIT, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Pettee Investors and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RIET and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.