RIET vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RIET (Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIET is a REIT fund tracking the Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield Index, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. RIET is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RIET charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

RIET vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RIET

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 9.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIET vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF	8.46%	2.43%	1.18%	13.04%	-25.29%	5.14%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RIET and EATZ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021	0.57

The correlation between RIET and EATZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RIET vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIET

RIET Risk / Return Rank: 26
RIET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
RIET Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
RIET Omega Ratio Rank: 23
RIET Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RIET Martin Ratio Rank: 27

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIET vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIET	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.60	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RIET	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.51%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.31%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RIET	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.30%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	—	—

RIET vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIET has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIET vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

RIET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF	10.74%	11.04%	10.17%	9.33%	9.33%	1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIET and EATZ in my portfolio?

RIET and EATZ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RIET or EATZ?

On fees, RIET is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIET or EATZ?

RIET is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RIET or EATZ?

RIET has the higher dividend yield at 10.74%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between RIET and EATZ?

RIET is categorized as REIT, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pettee Investors and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RIET and 1.00% for EATZ.