PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIET vs. EATZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RIET vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RIET vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RIET
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
-0.60%2.43%1.18%13.04%-25.29%2.35%
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
-0.73%-6.67%23.21%25.23%-20.68%0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIET achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly higher than EATZ's -0.73% return.


RIET

1D
1.12%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
-1.46%
1Y
-0.11%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
10Y*

EATZ

1D
1.62%
1M
-7.59%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-5.70%
1Y
-4.92%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RIET vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIET has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RIET vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIET
RIET Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RIET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIET Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RIET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIET Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EATZ
EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIET vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIETEATZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.01

-0.23

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.10

-0.19

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

-0.20

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.12

-0.38

+0.50

RIET vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIET Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the EATZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIET and EATZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIETEATZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

-0.23

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.07

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between RIET and EATZ is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RIET vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

RIET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, more than EATZ's 0.50% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
RIET
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
11.41%11.04%10.17%9.33%9.33%1.99%
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
0.50%0.50%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%

Drawdowns

RIET vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIET drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, roughly equal to the maximum EATZ drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIET and EATZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RIETEATZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-34.40%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-23.21%

+11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.32%

-18.11%

+3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.72%

-13.38%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

12.13%

-7.79%

Volatility

RIET vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison

Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) have volatilities of 5.11% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RIETEATZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

5.04%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

13.55%

-4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

21.22%

-5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

21.65%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.15%

21.65%

-2.50%