RIET vs. FAAR
RIET (Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIET is a REIT fund tracking the Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield Index, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. RIET is passively managed, while FAAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RIET returned 9.14%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for FAAR. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIET charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
RIET vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIET achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return.
RIET
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 12.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
RIET vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF | 7.32% | 2.43% | 1.18% | 13.04% | -25.29% | 5.14% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 20.23% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 10.15% | 3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIET and FAAR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIET vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
RIET
FAAR
RIET vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIET | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.35 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 4.75 | -3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 14.70 | -11.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIET vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIET drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIET and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIET | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.61% | -18.03% | -16.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -5.68% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -11.54% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -5.43% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.31% | -7.82% | -8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 1.89% | +1.47% |
Volatility
RIET vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.47%. This indicates that RIET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIET | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 2.47% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 9.68% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 13.37% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 12.95% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 11.53% | +7.42% |
RIET vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIET has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIET vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
RIET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than FAAR's 9.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.57% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF | 10.86% | 11.04% | 10.17% | 9.33% | 9.33% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIET and FAAR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIET has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to FAAR (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIET dropped -34.61% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 3-year performance, FAAR leads with 10.91% vs 9.14% for RIET. On fees, RIET is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RIET is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
RIET has the higher dividend yield at 10.86%, compared with 9.57% for FAAR.
RIET is categorized as REIT, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Pettee Investors and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RIET and 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIET and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer