RIET vs. BLDG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RIET (Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. RIET is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RIET returned 8.68%/yr vs 8.73%/yr for BLDG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RIET charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.

Performance

RIET vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RIET having a 6.14% return and BLDG slightly lower at 5.95%.

RIET

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 5.42%
• 1Y: 12.32%
• 3Y*: 8.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLDG

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIET vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF	6.14%	2.43%	1.18%	13.04%	-25.29%	2.35%
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.95%	4.26%	8.18%	1.76%	-14.66%	6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RIET and BLDG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021	0.85

The correlation between RIET and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

RIET vs. BLDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RIET	BLDG
Real Estate	87.8%	98.6%
Financial Services	2.6%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RIET vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIET

RIET Risk / Return Rank: 26
RIET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
RIET Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
RIET Omega Ratio Rank: 24
RIET Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RIET Martin Ratio Rank: 26

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 25
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIET vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RIET	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	0.93	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.35	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.16	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.02	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.68	3.60	+0.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIET vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIET Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIET and BLDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RIET	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	0.93	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	0.45	-0.51

Drawdowns

RIET vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIET drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIET and BLDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIET	BLDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.61%	-27.25%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-10.08%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-18.57%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.50%	-2.76%	-5.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.43%	-9.23%	-7.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	2.86%	+0.50%

Volatility

RIET vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF (RIET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIET	BLDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	3.60%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.18%	8.23%	+0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.14%	11.07%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	15.26%	+3.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	15.54%	+3.41%

RIET vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIET has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIET vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

RIET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than BLDG's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.72%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%
RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF	10.88%	11.04%	10.17%	9.33%	9.33%	1.99%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIET and BLDG in my portfolio?

RIET and BLDG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RIET or BLDG?

BLDG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to RIET (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIET dropped -34.61% vs BLDG's -27.25%.

Which ETF is better, RIET or BLDG?

On 3-year performance, BLDG leads with 8.73% vs 8.68% for RIET. On fees, RIET is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RIET has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RIET or BLDG?

Over the 3-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 8.73% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIET or BLDG?

RIET is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RIET or BLDG?

RIET has the higher dividend yield at 10.88%, compared with 5.72% for BLDG.

What is the main difference between RIET and BLDG?

They also come from different issuers: Pettee Investors and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RIET and 0.59% for BLDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RIET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.