PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RIDH.TO (RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF) and XEC.TO (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIDH.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by RBC, while XEC.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Morningstar EM GR CAD. RIDH.TO is actively managed, while XEC.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RIDH.TO returned 14.71%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for XEC.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIDH.TO charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for XEC.TO.

Performance

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF (XEC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIDH.TO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than XEC.TO's 27.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RIDH.TO has outperformed XEC.TO with an annualized return of 14.71%, while XEC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.71% annualized return.

RIDH.TO

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.78%
YTD
11.50%
6M
13.78%
1Y
31.66%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
17.37%
10Y*
14.71%

XEC.TO

1D
-0.88%
1M
10.15%
YTD
27.92%
6M
28.48%
1Y
54.44%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF		11.50%31.43%17.07%25.01%-2.03%24.91%-3.01%25.66%-5.74%12.88%
XEC.TO
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF		27.92%25.78%16.14%7.92%-14.68%-1.74%15.08%11.53%-8.26%27.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RIDH.TO and XEC.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2014

0.40

The correlation between RIDH.TO and XEC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (5 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RIDH.TO
XEC.TO

Financial Services

19.6%
18.4%

Industrials

19.1%
9.0%

Technology

9.8%
35.0%

Healthcare

9.5%
3.7%

Utilities

8.0%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
3.3%

Communication Services

7.1%
6.4%

Basic Materials

6.9%
6.9%

Energy

4.4%
3.9%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.7%

Financial Services

RIDH.TO
19.6%
XEC.TO
18.4%

Industrials

RIDH.TO
19.1%
XEC.TO
9.0%

Technology

RIDH.TO
9.8%
XEC.TO
35.0%

Healthcare

RIDH.TO
9.5%
XEC.TO
3.7%

Utilities

RIDH.TO
8.0%
XEC.TO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RIDH.TO
7.7%
XEC.TO
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

RIDH.TO
7.3%
XEC.TO
3.3%

Communication Services

RIDH.TO
7.1%
XEC.TO
6.4%

Basic Materials

RIDH.TO
6.9%
XEC.TO
6.9%

Energy

RIDH.TO
4.4%
XEC.TO
3.9%

Real Estate

RIDH.TO
0.6%
XEC.TO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF

Often compared with RIDH.TO:
RIDH.TO vs. TILV.TORIDH.TO vs. RPF.TORIDH.TO vs. QDX.TORIDH.TO vs. RCDC.TORIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEORIDH.TO vs. FCRI.TORIDH.TO vs. RUD.TO
Often compared with XEC.TO:
XEC.TO vs. XEF.TOXEC.TO vs. VEE.TOXEC.TO vs. XEM.TOXEC.TO vs. ZEM.TOXEC.TO vs. XEQT.TOXEC.TO vs. VFV.TOXEC.TO vs. XIC.TO

Return for Risk

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RIDH.TO
RIDH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
XEC.TO
XEC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XEC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XEC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF (XEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RIDH.TOXEC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.67
3.01

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.70
3.86

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.56

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

4.86

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.59

17.00

-0.42

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the XEC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIDH.TO and XEC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RIDH.TOXEC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

3.01

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.30

0.65

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.61

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.52

+0.38

Drawdowns

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIDH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, which is greater than XEC.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIDH.TO and XEC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RIDH.TOXEC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-32.54%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-11.25%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

-15.07%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.33%

-29.14%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.34%

-32.54%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-0.88%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-9.56%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.21%

-1.30%

Volatility

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) is 3.77%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF (XEC.TO) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that RIDH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RIDH.TOXEC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

7.80%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

15.85%

-6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

18.19%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.46%

15.91%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

17.60%

-1.81%

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIDH.TO has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than XEC.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIDH.TO vs. XEC.TO - Dividend Comparison

RIDH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than XEC.TO's 1.50% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF		3.07%3.12%7.51%9.53%6.85%7.07%4.73%9.16%8.80%5.59%10.87%17.06%
XEC.TO
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF		1.50%1.92%2.03%2.16%2.28%2.78%1.64%2.87%2.66%2.13%1.80%2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

RIDH.TO and XEC.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEC.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEC.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RIDH.TO.

RIDH.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XEC.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: RBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for RIDH.TO and 0.28% for XEC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIDH.TO and XEC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer