RICK vs. BABA
RICK (RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — RICK in Restaurants, BABA in Internet Retail. Over the past 10 years, RICK returned 11.05%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for BABA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RICK vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RICK achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RICK has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 11.05%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.
RICK
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 13.59%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- -30.50%
- 3Y*
- -28.96%
- 5Y*
- -16.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
RICK vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RICK RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. | 15.11% | -58.19% | -12.81% | -28.66% | 20.04% | 97.94% | 93.85% | -7.54% | -19.86% | 64.51% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between RICK and BABA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.21 |
The correlation between RICK and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.22 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RICK:
$211.65M
BABA:
$272.45B
RICK:
-$0.77
BABA:
CN¥33.90
RICK:
0.82
BABA:
2.26
RICK:
0.92
BABA:
1.75
RICK:
$281.63M
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
RICK:
$176.59M
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
RICK:
$30.38M
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RICK vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
RICK
BABA
RICK vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RICK | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | -0.06 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | -0.12 | -0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RICK vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RICK drawdown since its inception was -94.54%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RICK and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RICK | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.54% | -80.09% | -14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.83% | -39.94% | -8.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.58% | -39.94% | -32.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.09% | -72.48% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.72% | -80.09% | +1.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.23% | -62.20% | -9.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.94% | -37.56% | -16.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.20% | 19.58% | +15.62% |
Volatility
RICK vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) have volatilities of 10.13% and 10.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RICK | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 10.07% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.93% | 29.24% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.45% | 43.83% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.10% | 51.40% | -8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.00% | 43.40% | +8.60% |
Dividends
RICK vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
RICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than BABA's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RICK RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. | 1.06% | 1.17% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.38% | 0.63% | 0.54% | 0.43% | 0.70% |
Financials
RICK vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RICK vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison
RICK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.92M and revenue of 68.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.2%.
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
RICK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.81M and revenue of 68.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
RICK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -326.00K and revenue of 68.72M, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RICK and BABA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RICK has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RICK dropped -94.54% vs BABA's -80.09%.
BABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RICK and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer