RICGX vs. GAMPX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RICGX ( The Investment Company of America Class R-6) and GAMPX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P) are both mutual funds - RICGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Funds, while GAMPX is a MLPs fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RICGX returned 14.50%/yr vs 23.36%/yr for GAMPX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RICGX charges 0.27%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for GAMPX.

Performance

RICGX vs. GAMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RICGX achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than GAMPX's 24.02% return.

RICGX

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 6M: 6.87%
• 1Y: 19.97%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

GAMPX

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -4.11%
• YTD: 24.02%
• 6M: 24.31%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: 23.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RICGX vs. GAMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RICGX The Investment Company of America Class R-6	7.78%	20.83%	25.28%	28.94%	-15.24%	25.49%	14.48%	24.88%	-6.51%
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P	24.02%	5.43%	58.40%	15.11%	19.15%	38.33%	-17.23%	17.00%	-12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RICGX and GAMPX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2018	0.51

The correlation between RICGX and GAMPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RICGX vs. GAMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RICGX

RICGX Risk / Return Rank: 40
RICGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RICGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RICGX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
RICGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
RICGX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

GAMPX

GAMPX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GAMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GAMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
GAMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
GAMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GAMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RICGX vs. GAMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RICGX	GAMPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.91	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.62	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.33	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	3.88	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.60	9.06	+0.54

RICGX vs. GAMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RICGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the GAMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RICGX and GAMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RICGX vs. GAMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RICGX drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum GAMPX drawdown of -59.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RICGX and GAMPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RICGX	GAMPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.06%	-59.18%	+28.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.03%	-7.23%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.37%	-17.08%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.14%	-21.97%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.93%	-4.45%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-8.51%	+4.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	3.09%	-0.82%

Volatility

RICGX vs. GAMPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) is 5.12%, while Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that RICGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RICGX	GAMPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	5.52%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.60%	11.25%	-0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.27%	14.70%	-1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	20.57%	-4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.60%	25.78%	-9.18%

RICGX vs. GAMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RICGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than GAMPX's 1.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

RICGX vs. GAMPX - Dividend Comparison

RICGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than GAMPX's 8.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P	8.17%	10.13%	25.55%	10.34%	4.76%	8.54%	4.33%	4.99%	3.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RICGX The Investment Company of America Class R-6	9.60%	10.89%	9.59%	5.25%	6.45%	7.24%	1.68%	6.74%	11.60%	7.36%	5.77%	9.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RICGX and GAMPX in my portfolio?

RICGX and GAMPX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RICGX or GAMPX?

GAMPX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to RICGX (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RICGX dropped -31.06% vs GAMPX's -59.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.