RIBIX vs. RCPIX
RIBIX (RBC Impact Bond Fund) and RCPIX (RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - RIBIX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by RBC Global Asset Management., while RCPIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. Over the past 3 years, RIBIX returned 2.98%/yr vs 6.87%/yr for RCPIX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RIBIX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for RCPIX.
Performance
RIBIX vs. RCPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIBIX achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than RCPIX's 0.09% return.
RIBIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.87%
- 10Y*
- —
RCPIX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RIBIX vs. RCPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | -1.07% | 5.95% | 1.11% | 5.50% | -14.47% | -0.15% |
RCPIX RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund | 0.09% | 8.16% | 5.97% | 9.64% | -13.59% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIBIX and RCPIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between RIBIX and RCPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIBIX vs. RCPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RIBIX
RCPIX
RIBIX vs. RCPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund (RCPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIBIX | RCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.31 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.89 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | 5.47 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIBIX | RCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.67 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.32 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
RIBIX vs. RCPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, roughly equal to the maximum RCPIX drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and RCPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIBIX | RCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.37% | -18.89% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.29% | -3.46% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.20% | -5.15% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -1.98% | -4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -5.93% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 1.19% | -0.07% |
Volatility
RIBIX vs. RCPIX - Volatility Comparison
RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund (RCPIX) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIBIX | RCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.51% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 2.98% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28% | 3.93% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 5.65% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.18% | 5.65% | -0.47% |
RIBIX vs. RCPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than RCPIX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIBIX vs. RCPIX - Dividend Comparison
RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than RCPIX's 5.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCPIX RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund | 5.82% | 4.95% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 3.77% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | 3.54% | 4.02% | 3.35% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 3.28% | 3.91% | 2.44% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIBIX and RCPIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCPIX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to RIBIX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIBIX dropped -19.37% vs RCPIX's -18.89%.
RCPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIBIX and RCPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer