PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RIBIX vs. RBCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RIBIX vs. RBCIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RIBIX (RBC Impact Bond Fund) and RBCIX (RBC China Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - RIBIX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by RBC Global Asset Management., while RBCIX is a China Equities fund managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. Over the past 3 years, RIBIX returned 2.98%/yr vs 17.13%/yr for RBCIX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIBIX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for RBCIX.

Performance

RIBIX vs. RBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC China Equity Fund (RBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIBIX achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than RBCIX's 3.16% return.

RIBIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-0.85%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
—

RBCIX

1D
-1.16%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
3.16%
6M
4.77%
1Y
35.03%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIBIX vs. RBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund		-1.07%5.95%1.11%5.50%-6.64%
RBCIX
RBC China Equity Fund		3.16%50.92%6.24%-9.64%-7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RIBIX and RBCIX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Impact Bond Fund

RBC China Equity Fund

Often compared with RIBIX:
RIBIX vs. RUSIXRIBIX vs. RGOIXRIBIX vs. TMCIXRIBIX vs. RBESXRIBIX vs. REEIXRIBIX vs. RSDIXRIBIX vs. REMVX
Often compared with RBCIX:
RBCIX vs. EVCGXRBCIX vs. 0P0000706A.TORBCIX vs. RSDIXRBCIX vs. RUSIXRBCIX vs. OBCHXRBCIX vs. BGCBXRBCIX vs. 0P00007069.TO

Return for Risk

RIBIX vs. RBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RIBIX
RIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
RBCIX
RBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIBIX vs. RBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC China Equity Fund (RBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RIBIXRBCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.63
1.86

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.89
2.54

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.33

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.77

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

7.76

-5.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIBIX vs. RBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the RBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIBIX and RBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RIBIXRBCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.86

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.31

-0.13

Drawdowns

RIBIX vs. RBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, smaller than the maximum RBCIX drawdown of -32.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and RBCIX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RIBIXRBCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-32.45%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-13.45%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-25.67%

+19.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-6.32%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-13.69%

+7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

4.80%

-3.68%

Volatility

RIBIX vs. RBCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) is 1.48%, while RBC China Equity Fund (RBCIX) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that RIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RIBIXRBCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

7.15%

-5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

14.45%

-11.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

20.04%

-15.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

26.01%

-20.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.18%

26.01%

-20.83%

RIBIX vs. RBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than RBCIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIBIX vs. RBCIX - Dividend Comparison

RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, which matches RBCIX's 3.55% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBCIX
RBC China Equity Fund		3.55%3.66%2.01%1.20%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund		3.54%4.02%3.35%2.50%2.10%1.94%3.28%3.91%2.44%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

RIBIX and RBCIX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBCIX has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to RIBIX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIBIX dropped -19.37% vs RBCIX's -32.45%.

RBCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIBIX and RBCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer