RHRX vs. CEFZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) and CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RHRX charges 1.36%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for CEFZ.

Performance

RHRX vs. CEFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 21.71% return, which is significantly higher than CEFZ's 5.94% return.

RHRX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 6.21%
• YTD: 21.71%
• 6M: 22.05%
• 1Y: 42.26%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEFZ

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHRX vs. CEFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	21.71%	9.56%
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	5.94%	7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and CEFZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

RHRX vs. CEFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 91
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHRX vs. CEFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RHRX	CEFZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.22	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.33	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.28	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.67	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RHRX	CEFZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.67	-1.14

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. CEFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, which is greater than CEFZ's maximum drawdown of -6.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and CEFZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHRX	CEFZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	-6.66%	-18.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.96%	-1.20%	-7.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RHRX	CEFZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.18%	10.38%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	10.38%	+8.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.04%	10.38%	+8.66%

RHRX vs. CEFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFZ's 3.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

RHRX vs. CEFZ - Dividend Comparison

RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%.

Position	TTM	2025
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	8.21%	4.17%
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RHRX and CEFZ in my portfolio?

RHRX and CEFZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RHRX or CEFZ?

On fees, RHRX is cheaper at 1.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RHRX or CEFZ?

RHRX is cheaper with a 1.36% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RHRX or CEFZ?

CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.

What is the main difference between RHRX and CEFZ?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for RHRX and 3.36% for CEFZ.