PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RHHBY vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RHHBY vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roche Holding AG (RHHBY) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHHBY achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 35.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RHHBY has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 8.27%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.54% annualized return.


RHHBY

1D
0.58%
1M
0.76%
YTD
3.24%
6M
6.39%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
8.27%

RIO

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.97%
YTD
35.32%
6M
43.14%
1Y
89.03%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
22.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHHBY vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RHHBY
Roche Holding AG
3.24%52.86%0.23%-4.02%-22.21%20.20%9.94%33.47%2.16%14.32%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
35.32%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RHHBY and RIO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.26

Fundamentals

EPS

RHHBY:

CHF 5.42

RIO:

$13.11

PE Ratio

RHHBY:

7.59

RIO:

8.03

PS Ratio

RHHBY:

1.23

RIO:

1.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

RHHBY:

CHF 107.65B

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RHHBY:

CHF 79.28B

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

RHHBY:

CHF 31.01B

RIO:

$40.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RHHBY vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHHBY
RHHBY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RHHBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHHBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHHBY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RHHBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHHBY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHHBY vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roche Holding AG (RHHBY) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RHHBYRIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

5.89

-4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

21.91

-18.52

RHHBY vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHHBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHHBY and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RHHBY vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHHBY drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHHBY and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHHBYRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-88.97%

+43.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.38%

-15.19%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-24.19%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.88%

-35.25%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.88%

-37.47%

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.12%

-5.97%

-6.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.84%

-23.76%

+10.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.09%

4.09%

+4.00%

Volatility

RHHBY vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roche Holding AG (RHHBY) is 8.27%, while Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that RHHBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHHBYRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

11.81%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

24.27%

-5.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.49%

29.32%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.34%

29.30%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.55%

30.65%

-8.10%

Dividends

RHHBY vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

RHHBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than RIO's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RHHBY
Roche Holding AG
3.00%2.69%3.87%3.55%3.23%1.57%1.66%1.70%3.58%3.25%3.57%2.91%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.82%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

RHHBY vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roche Holding AG and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20212022202320242025
30.32B
30.65B
(RHHBY) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RHHBY values in CHF, RIO values in USD

RHHBY vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Roche Holding AG and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
71.7%
26.6%
Portfolio components
RHHBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roche Holding AG reported a gross profit of 21.75B and revenue of 30.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

RHHBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roche Holding AG reported an operating income of 7.05B and revenue of 30.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

RHHBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roche Holding AG reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.32B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RHHBY and RIO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIO has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to RHHBY (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHHBY dropped -45.73% vs RIO's -88.97%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHHBY and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer