PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RHHBY vs. NNN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RHHBY vs. NNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roche Holding AG (RHHBY) and National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHHBY achieves a -2.06% return, which is significantly lower than NNN's 14.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RHHBY has outperformed NNN with an annualized return of 7.13%, while NNN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.


RHHBY

1D
-0.14%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-2.06%
6M
3.24%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
7.13%

NNN

1D
0.84%
1M
0.30%
YTD
14.71%
6M
10.58%
1Y
12.62%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
4.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHHBY vs. NNN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RHHBY
Roche Holding AG
-2.06%52.86%0.23%-4.02%-22.21%20.20%9.94%33.47%2.16%14.32%
NNN
National Retail Properties, Inc.
14.71%2.81%-0.06%-0.60%-0.01%23.08%-19.29%14.78%17.82%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RHHBY and NNN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.21

Fundamentals

EPS

RHHBY:

$5.42

NNN:

$2.05

PE Ratio

RHHBY:

9.04

NNN:

21.51

PS Ratio

RHHBY:

1.46

NNN:

8.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

RHHBY:

$107.65B

NNN:

$935.78M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RHHBY:

$79.28B

NNN:

$761.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

RHHBY:

$31.01B

NNN:

$870.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RHHBY vs. NNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHHBY
RHHBY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RHHBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHHBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHHBY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RHHBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHHBY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NNN
NNN Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHHBY vs. NNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roche Holding AG (RHHBY) and National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RHHBYNNNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

0.78

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.17

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.39

3.31

+0.08

RHHBY vs. NNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHHBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the NNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHHBY and NNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RHHBYNNNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.78

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.18

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.16

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.40

-0.06

Drawdowns

RHHBY vs. NNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHHBY drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum NNN drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHHBY and NNN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHHBYNNNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-56.17%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.38%

-8.83%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.24%

-22.03%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.88%

-25.22%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.88%

-54.99%

+14.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.63%

-2.45%

-14.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.84%

-9.82%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

3.82%

+3.96%

Volatility

RHHBY vs. NNN - Volatility Comparison

Roche Holding AG (RHHBY) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN) at 4.61%. This indicates that RHHBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHHBYNNNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

4.61%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.98%

11.44%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.00%

16.32%

+10.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.31%

19.66%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

28.08%

-5.57%

Dividends

RHHBY vs. NNN - Dividend Comparison

RHHBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than NNN's 5.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NNN
National Retail Properties, Inc.
5.43%5.96%5.61%5.17%4.72%4.37%5.06%3.79%4.02%4.31%4.03%4.27%
RHHBY
Roche Holding AG
3.16%2.69%3.87%3.55%3.23%1.57%1.66%1.70%3.58%3.25%3.57%2.91%

Financials

RHHBY vs. NNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roche Holding AG and National Retail Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B202120222023202420252026
30.32B
240.42M
(RHHBY) Total Revenue
(NNN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RHHBY vs. NNN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Roche Holding AG and National Retail Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
71.7%
95.9%
Portfolio components
RHHBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roche Holding AG reported a gross profit of 21.75B and revenue of 30.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

NNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 230.63M and revenue of 240.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

RHHBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roche Holding AG reported an operating income of 7.05B and revenue of 30.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

NNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.65M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.

RHHBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roche Holding AG reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.32B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.

NNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 93.95M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in a net margin of 39.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RHHBY and NNN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RHHBY has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to NNN (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHHBY dropped -45.73% vs NNN's -56.17%.

RHHBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHHBY and NNN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer