PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGYY vs. ACII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGYY vs. ACII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RGYY

1D
1.16%
1M
0.64%
YTD
-24.25%
6M
-29.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACII

1D
-0.21%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGYY vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGYY and ACII is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGYY vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGYY vs. ACII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGYYACIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.70

-4.37

+2.67

Drawdowns

RGYY vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGYY drawdown since its inception was -37.05%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -0.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGYY and ACII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGYYACIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.05%

-0.32%

-36.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.42%

-0.32%

-33.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.94%

-0.14%

-22.80%

Volatility

RGYY vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGYYACIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.60%

3.15%

+29.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.60%

3.15%

+29.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.60%

3.15%

+29.45%

RGYY vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGYY vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison

RGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 106.54%, more than ACII's 0.73% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGYY and ACII have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for RGYY.

RGYY has the higher dividend yield at 106.54%, compared with 0.73% for ACII.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RGYY and 0.79% for ACII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGYY and ACII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer