RGTZ vs. TSLQ
RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
RGTZ vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -71.32% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 1.43% return.
RGTZ
- 1D
- 15.05%
- 1M
- 78.63%
- 6M
- -61.22%
- YTD
- -71.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- -59.82%
- 3Y*
- -63.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTZ vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | -71.32% | 7.21% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 1.43% | -15.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTZ and TSLQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTZ vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
RGTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLQ
RGTZ vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTZ | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTZ vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTZ | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -98.73% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -97.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.67% | -98.49% | +15.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.11% | -68.10% | +19.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 54.82% | — |
Volatility
RGTZ vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTZ | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 213.69% | 89.43% | +124.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 213.69% | 94.77% | +118.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 213.69% | 94.77% | +118.92% |
RGTZ vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTZ vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
RGTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 10.41% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTZ and TSLQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.41%, compared with 0.00% for RGTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 1.17% for TSLQ.
Find the right allocation for RGTZ and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer