RGTZ vs. SPXU
RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance ETFs, while SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). RGTZ is actively managed, while SPXU is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPXU.
Performance
RGTZ vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -85.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPXU's -20.19% return.
RGTZ
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- -85.18%
- 6M
- -81.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
RGTZ vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | -85.18% | 7.21% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTZ and SPXU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTZ vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank
RGTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXU
RGTZ vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTZ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTZ vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, smaller than the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and SPXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTZ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -99.99% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.04% | -99.99% | +8.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -93.33% | +48.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.37% | — |
Volatility
RGTZ vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTZ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.33% | 37.35% | +180.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 218.33% | 50.62% | +167.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 218.33% | 53.43% | +164.90% |
RGTZ vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTZ vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison
RGTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTZ and SPXU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXU is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXU is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 0.00% for RGTZ.
RGTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPXU is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 0.90% for SPXU.
Find the right allocation for RGTZ and SPXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer