RGTZ vs. SPDN
RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. RGTZ is actively managed, while SPDN is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
RGTZ vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -71.32% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -7.06% return.
RGTZ
- 1D
- 15.05%
- 1M
- 78.63%
- 6M
- -61.22%
- YTD
- -71.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 1Y
- -12.88%
- 3Y*
- -11.23%
- 5Y*
- -8.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.21%
RGTZ vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | -71.32% | 7.21% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -7.06% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTZ and SPDN is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTZ vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
RGTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPDN
RGTZ vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTZ vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than SPDN's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -75.31% | -17.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.67% | -74.97% | -7.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.11% | -48.82% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.44% | — |
Volatility
RGTZ vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 213.69% | 12.71% | +200.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 213.69% | 16.97% | +196.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 213.69% | 18.00% | +195.69% |
RGTZ vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTZ vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
RGTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.34% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTZ and SPDN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.00% for RGTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 0.50% for SPDN.
Find the right allocation for RGTZ and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer