RGTZ vs. FLYD
RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds. RGTZ is actively managed, while FLYD is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FLYD.
Performance
RGTZ vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -85.18% return, which is significantly lower than FLYD's -26.01% return.
RGTZ
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- -85.18%
- 6M
- -81.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLYD
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -24.44%
- YTD
- -26.01%
- 6M
- -22.75%
- 1Y
- -55.79%
- 3Y*
- -55.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTZ vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | -85.18% | 7.21% |
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -26.01% | -17.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTZ and FLYD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTZ vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank
RGTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLYD
RGTZ vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTZ | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTZ vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, smaller than the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and FLYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTZ | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -98.34% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -94.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.04% | -98.29% | +7.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -83.23% | +38.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 34.14% | — |
Volatility
RGTZ vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTZ | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.33% | 75.78% | +142.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 218.33% | 83.76% | +134.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 218.33% | 83.76% | +134.57% |
RGTZ vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTZ vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison
Neither RGTZ nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTZ and FLYD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.
RGTZ and FLYD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 0.95% for FLYD.
Find the right allocation for RGTZ and FLYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer