PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTX vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTX vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -33.35% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.52% return.


RGTX

1D
-20.63%
1M
51.50%
YTD
-33.35%
6M
-56.81%
1Y
-6.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFED

1D
-1.24%
1M
4.85%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-3.51%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTX vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGTX and IFED is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTX vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTX
RGTX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTX vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGTXIFEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.04

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.14

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

0.34

-0.43

RGTX vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTX and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGTXIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

0.12

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.65

-0.39

Drawdowns

RGTX vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTXIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.33%

-22.36%

-74.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.33%

-14.65%

-82.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.10%

-5.50%

-87.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.03%

-5.84%

-49.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.91%

5.75%

+65.16%

Volatility

RGTX vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 83.08% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.50%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTXIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

83.08%

4.50%

+78.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

139.30%

12.86%

+126.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

215.89%

16.21%

+199.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

223.72%

19.88%

+203.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

223.72%

19.88%

+203.84%

RGTX vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTX vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGTX and IFED have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTX has higher volatility (83.08%) compared to IFED (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs IFED's -22.36%.

On 1-year performance, IFED leads with 1.97% vs -6.41% for RGTX. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFED has performed better with a 1.97% return vs -6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.

RGTX has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.45% for IFED.

IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTX and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer