RGTX vs. GBIL
RGTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. RGTX is actively managed, while GBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTX returned -75.10% vs 3.74% for GBIL. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.
Performance
RGTX vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -79.79% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 2.00% return.
RGTX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -37.77%
- 6M
- -67.18%
- YTD
- -79.79%
- 1Y
- -75.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -37.85%
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $54.62M | $52.46M | $69.99M | |
| $9.02M | $9.29M | $47.02M |
RGTX vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | -79.79% | 162.83% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 2.00% | 3.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTX and GBIL is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTX vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
RGTX
GBIL
RGTX vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTX | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -149.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 92.87 | -91.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 187.90 | -188.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 2,250.52 | -2,251.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTX vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -98.34%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTX | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.34% | -0.76% | -97.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.34% | -0.02% | -98.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.91% | 0.00% | -97.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.82% | -0.04% | -59.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 80.31% | 0.00% | +80.31% |
Volatility
RGTX vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 53.99% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTX | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.99% | 0.06% | +53.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 142.88% | 0.14% | +142.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 212.51% | 0.21% | +212.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.94% | 0.58% | +219.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.94% | 0.47% | +219.47% |
RGTX vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTX vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than GBIL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.68% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | 2.70% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTX and GBIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTX has higher volatility (53.99%) compared to GBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -98.34% vs GBIL's -0.76%.
On 1-year performance, GBIL leads with 3.74% vs -75.10% for RGTX. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GBIL has performed better with a 3.74% return vs -75.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.
GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.70% for RGTX.
RGTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GBIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.12% for GBIL.
GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.10 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTX and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer