RGTU vs. TSLQ
RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
RGTU vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -46.61% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 1.82% return.
RGTU
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -42.63%
- YTD
- -46.61%
- 6M
- -64.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- -62.10%
- 3Y*
- -65.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -46.61% | 90.43% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 1.82% | -55.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTU and TSLQ is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTU vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
RGTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLQ
RGTU vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTU | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTU vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTU | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.96% | -98.73% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -72.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -97.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.03% | -98.48% | +4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.49% | -67.58% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 56.11% | — |
Volatility
RGTU vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTU | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.34% | 88.72% | +130.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.34% | 94.17% | +125.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.34% | 94.17% | +125.17% |
RGTU vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTU vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.64%, more than TSLQ's 10.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 38.64% | 20.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 10.38% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTU and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 38.64%, compared with 10.38% for TSLQ.
RGTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 1.17% for TSLQ.
Find the right allocation for RGTU and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer