RGTU vs. QUBX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Over the past year, RGTU returned -24.32% vs -91.44% for QUBX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

RGTU vs. QUBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -61.02% return, which is significantly lower than QUBX's -55.42% return.

RGTU

• 1D: -11.74%
• 1M: -51.89%
• YTD: -61.02%
• 6M: -68.54%
• 1Y: -24.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QUBX

• 1D: -12.79%
• 1M: -45.22%
• YTD: -55.42%
• 6M: -64.42%
• 1Y: -91.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. QUBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-61.02%	90.43%
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	-55.42%	-83.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and QUBX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.83

The correlation between RGTU and QUBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. QUBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 16
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 8

QUBX

QUBX Risk / Return Rank: 4
QUBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
QUBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
QUBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
QUBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QUBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. QUBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTU	QUBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	-0.46	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	-0.40	+1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.96	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	-0.95	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.33	-1.20	+0.87

RGTU vs. QUBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the QUBX Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTU and QUBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. QUBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, roughly equal to the maximum QUBX drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and QUBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	QUBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-96.40%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.96%	-96.40%	-0.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.64%	-94.59%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.86%	-70.85%	+6.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	73.82%	76.01%	-2.19%

Volatility

RGTU vs. QUBX - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) has a higher volatility of 64.59% compared to Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) at 58.01%. This indicates that RGTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	QUBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	64.59%	58.01%	+6.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	140.29%	132.59%	+7.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.46%	201.26%	+18.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	219.07%	200.88%	+18.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	219.07%	200.88%	+18.19%

RGTU vs. QUBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RGTU and QUBX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

RGTU vs. QUBX - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.92%, while QUBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	52.92%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and QUBX in my portfolio?

RGTU and QUBX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGTU or QUBX?

RGTU has higher volatility (64.59%) compared to QUBX (58.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTU dropped -96.96% vs QUBX's -96.40%.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or QUBX?

On 1-year performance, RGTU leads with -24.32% vs -91.44% for QUBX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QUBX has been the lower-risk option at 58.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGTU or QUBX?

Over the 1-year period, RGTU has performed better with a -24.32% return vs -91.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or QUBX?

RGTU and QUBX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or QUBX?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 52.92%, compared with 0.00% for QUBX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.