RGTU vs. QUBX
RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
RGTU vs. QUBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RGTU having a -27.08% return and QUBX slightly higher at -26.52%.
RGTU
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 46.09%
- YTD
- -27.08%
- 6M
- -62.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 18.69%
- YTD
- -26.52%
- 6M
- -61.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU vs. QUBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -27.08% | 80.81% |
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | -26.52% | -82.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTU and QUBX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTU vs. QUBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGTU | QUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.44 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
RGTU vs. QUBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, roughly equal to the maximum QUBX drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and QUBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTU | QUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.96% | -96.40% | -0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.85% | -91.08% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.33% | -69.80% | +7.47% |
Volatility
RGTU vs. QUBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTU | QUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.22% | 200.33% | +18.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.22% | 200.33% | +18.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.22% | 200.33% | +18.89% |
RGTU vs. QUBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RGTU and QUBX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
RGTU vs. QUBX - Dividend Comparison
RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%, while QUBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 28.29% | 20.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTU and QUBX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RGTU and QUBX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 0.00% for QUBX.
Find the right allocation for RGTU and QUBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer