RGTU vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

RGTU vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.08% return.

RGTU

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 46.09%
• YTD: -27.08%
• 6M: -62.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-27.08%	80.81%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.08%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and BAMU is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGTU	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	4.15	-3.99

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-0.36%	-96.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.85%	0.00%	-91.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.33%	-0.02%	-62.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.22%	0.59%	+218.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	219.22%	0.87%	+218.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	219.22%	0.87%	+218.35%

RGTU vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTU vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%, more than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	28.29%	20.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and BAMU in my portfolio?

RGTU and BAMU have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or BAMU?

On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or BAMU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 3.06% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between RGTU and BAMU?

RGTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 1.09% for BAMU.